Print this Page

born blind to the light of the world

So they took up stones so that they might throw them at him. In fact, Jesus was hidden and he came out from the temple and, passing by, he saw a man blind from birth. (John’s first century eyewitness biography of Jesus: Chapter 9: 1-12)
 
Who are “they” and why did they try to stone Jesus in the Jerusalem Temple in AD 30? See the Infos of the past few weeks. In short, Jesus had stated that he was sent out by the Father, that he himself existed prior to Abrahan (alive circa 1000 BC) and that he was there to glorify the Father.

But they were blind to all that. Born blind?

And his disciples asked him, stating, “Rabbi, who sinned, this one or his parents, that he might be born blind?” Jesus replied, “Neither this man sinned, nor his parents, but that the works of God may be revealed in him. It is necessary for us to work the works of the one sending me until it is day; night is coming, when no one is able to work. When I may be in the world, I am the light of the world.” 

Do you ever wonder about the same things that bothered the disciples at that time? Was he afflicted by God because he had sinned? Sinned before he was born? Or was he afflicted by God as a punishment to his parents for their sins? Why has affliction come onto me?

‘Neither’ was the answer. The questions looked backwards. Jesus looked forwards into the man’s future. It seems that, back there in AD Jerusalem, all are to have revealed to them “the works of God” through what takes place with this blind-from-birth man. 

 
To “work the works of God” is the prime necessity for Jesus and “the one sending” him. What on earth were those works?

.
Having said these things, prostrate, he spat and made clay from the spittle and anointed the clay upon his eyes and said to him, “Go under! Wash yourself into the bathing pool of the Siloam!” (which is translated “Sent Out one”). 

Jesus, “prostrate” on the earth? “Clay made from [his] spittle and anointed the clay upon [the man's] eyes”? The man was instructed to “go under”? And then to “wash” himself in “the Sent Out one”? Are all these pictures - parallels for something else?

Although everything had been done for the blind-from-birth man, something was in fact required from him, He needed to go and wash himself, seemingly completely, in that “bathing pool”. He had not even been told that he might receive his sight. He needed to decide whether or not to go along with it, to “go under” “into the bathing pool of the Sent Out one”.

So he went away and washed himself and came seeing. 

He decided. Are those – cleansing and sight-giving – “the works of God”?

So the neighbours, and those observing him the prior time that he was a beggar, were stating, “Is this not the one sitting and begging?” Some stated that, “It is this one.” Others stated, “No, but this one is like him.” He was stating that, “I myself am.” 

From this we now know that this sightless-from-birth man was “a beggar”. By "begging" he conirmed that he had negative economic value. 

 
So they were stating to him, “How were your eyes opened?” That one was replying, “The man, the one named Jesus, made clay and anointed my eyes and said to me this, ‘Go down into the Siloam and wash yourself!” So I went away and washed. I received sight.” 

.
Pressed for an explanation, the blind-from-birth man gave it. He had met Jesus. He had had Jesus’ clay placed upon his eyes. He had gone under. He had washed in the pool of the Sent Out one. He had received sight.

And they said to him, “Where is that one?” He states, “I do not know.” 

Who are these “they”? Are they the same “they” who a short while previously (see above) had taken up stones to kill Jesus. Some wanted to find Jesus so as to remain blind; others so as to receive sight.

 
Sinner Syvret

Email this newsletter to a friend
*All mandatory fields must be filled in

Friend`s name
Friend`s email address *
Your name
Your email address *
Message

Send comment
*All mandatory fields must be filled in

Your name *
Your email address *
Your comment *