As can be seen above, a blind-from-birth man, who can now see clearly, is causing deep controversy in AD 30 Jerusalem. It was well known that “the Pharisees” wanted to get rid of Jesus, so much so that his stoning had been attempted a short while before.
A miraculous sign of deity like this was the last thing they wanted. They had to disprove it somehow. Otherwise, they’d have to accept it.
So some from the Pharisees were stating, “This man is not from God, for he does not keep the Sabbath.” Others were stating, “How is a sinful man able to do such signs?” and there was a division in them.
“Some from” them found the answer they wanted. The sight restoration had taken place on “the Sabbath” (when God’s Law forbade all work), “this man” was a breaker of God’s Law and therefore “a sinful man”. On that basis the miraculous sign had not taken place. But it had.
So they state again to the blind one, “What do you state concerning him, since he opened your eyes?” In fact, that one said this, “He is a prophet.”
In a renewed effort to square the circle, they ask “the blind one” for a statement about Jesus. “He is a prophet.” Unfortunately for them, this statement - “He is a prophet.” – meant that Jesus was a person bringing to the nation of Israel the truth revealed by the Lord God.
|