If, secretly, an overt follower of Jesus is not genuine then that “will … come to be revealed.” Equally, “a concealed thing” will “be known and … revealed.” How often in our everyday lives are we fooling others and being fooled? But “the light” is “the light.”
“See then how you hear! Because to whoever may have it will be given to him, and from whoever may not have, what he thinks he has will be taken away from him.”
Oh, dear… “What he thinks he has…will be taken away.” Is this another warning about genuineness? When Jesus said, “See then how you hear!” he was mixing the metaphors but the thrust of his imperative is that one should look carefully at the way in which we are responding to what we hear about him. How are we responding to him? Which of the four types of response to “the seed” accurately and genuinely describes my own response?
But his mother and brothers came near to him, and they were not able to attain togetherness with him through the crowd.
The way in which Luke describes the situation of Jesus’ human “mother and brothers” is interesting. At that time, “they were not able to attain togetherness with him.” Is “togetherness with him” an accurate description of genuine familiarity? Of what takes place when “the seed” is genuinely received and welcomed by “the fine earth”? Of “togetherness” in “the light” who is Jesus?
But he himself was messaged, “Your mother and your brothers have stood outside, desiring to see you.”
Jesus “was messaged.” Is having sent a message to Jesus any good in the final analysis? Is even having "stood outside” any good in the final analysis? Is there a hint here of what is really, truly needed by every human being – the attaining of “togetherness with him”?
|